Mar
21

How Do I Find the Law?

What All Counts as the Law?

Per­haps you’ve been curi­ous in the past on what the law actu­ally is, as opposed to what peo­ple say it is. Maybe you’ve won­dered what the heck attor­neys do all the time or why they think they know so much. If you’ve ever thought to your­self that Perry Mason or Patty Hewes looks like a pretty smart cookie and fan­cied your­self a lit­i­ga­tor, per­haps you’ve won­dered what it would be like to be an attor­ney. Even if you have no inter­est in prac­tic­ing law, per­haps you’re just curi­ous about the law of the land and would like to know how to read it. If any of these describe you, then this could very well be your first taste into what it means to study the law.


The law has caused the death of more trees than any for­est fire imag­in­able. At such broad terms, the “law” cov­ers not only your local ordi­nances and codes, state laws, state admin­is­tra­tive rules, pub­lished and unpub­lished case law and admin­is­tra­tive pro­ceed­ings, it cov­ers all fed­eral laws, admin­is­tra­tive rules, and cases as well. All this with­out even men­tion­ing the laws of other coun­tries and the laws that gov­ern inter­na­tional rela­tions. When one stops to really think about it, the full scope of the “law” can make one’s head spin.


Although you might never nego­ti­ate a treaty between sov­er­eigns, just under­stand­ing how to research the laws of one’s state alone can be quite ben­e­fi­cial. There­fore, this arti­cle will give a basic break­down of the legal struc­ture as works in Ore­gon and where you can find use­ful resources when you want to look up a legal issue.

So Where Can I Read Oregon’s Laws?

The laws of Ore­gon begin and end with the Ore­gon Revised Code. The Ore­gon Revised Code is the body of statutes writ­ten by our elected state rep­re­sen­ta­tives which forms the start­ing point for any legal issue or ques­tion. Oregon’s elected rep­re­sen­ta­tives (some­times) work together to write the statutes that guide how our state should func­tion, from the courts to its cit­i­zens to its cor­po­ra­tions and non­profit orga­ni­za­tions. From there, the cit­i­zens and cor­po­ra­tions and non­prof­its of the world argue and fight over what those statutes mean. When judges are asked to ref­eree and solve these argu­ments, those judges write writ­ten opin­ions, cre­at­ing case law that fur­ther inter­prets what those statutes mean. Even judges inter­pret the inter­pre­ta­tions of other judges when peo­ple seek appeals. Even the statutes and case law aren’t often spe­cific or detailed enough, so often times, Oregon’s rep­re­sen­ta­tives cre­ate state agen­cies to spe­cial­ize in writ­ing laws and solv­ing con­tro­ver­sies relat­ing to entire areas of the law, which are called admin­is­tra­tive rules. These admin­is­tra­tive rules are also laws. In Ore­gon, you can access these three impor­tant areas of the law all by use of the internet

  1. Statutes
  2. State Agency Admin­is­tra­tive Law
  3. Judi­cial Case Law

The many vol­umes of the Ore­gon Statutes are laid out at the Ore­gon State Leg­is­la­ture web­site. These statutes cover more top­ics than I could list, includ­ing crim­i­nal laws in Chap­ters 130 through the 180s and fam­ily laws in Chap­ters 107 through 110 (and a few other places), just to name a few high­lights.


The Ore­gon Admin­is­tra­tive Rules can be viewed at the Ore­gon Sec­re­tary of State’s web­site. Inter­est­ingly, the author­ity for any pro­vi­sion of the admin­is­tra­tive must cor­re­spond with a par­tic­u­lar del­e­ga­tion of author­ity specif­i­cally within the Ore­gon Statutes. There­fore, each admin­is­tra­tive rule sec­tion relates to a cor­re­spond­ing statu­tory sec­tion. Any com­pre­hen­sive research of a par­tic­u­lar legal issue can often require in-depth research of both bod­ies of law.


Lastly, but cer­tainly not least, no analy­sis of the law would be com­plete with­out a thor­ough under­stand­ing of the pub­lished case law inter­pret­ing those statutes and admin­is­tra­tive reviews. Case law research is a tricky art often aided by case law research soft­ware cost­ing thou­sands of dol­lars in sub­scrip­tion fees. How­ever, you can research case law for free at Google Scholar. When search­ing legal opin­ions in Google Scholar, remem­ber to type your search terms in the search box (using the statute num­ber itself as a key­word is often a good place to start). Also, don’t for­get to select search­ing only Ore­gon cases at the bot­tom of the screen. Oth­er­wise you would be search­ing case law for all 50 states and the fed­eral gov­ern­ment as well. Even with just Ore­gon, the “laws” of Ore­gon span sev­eral hun­dred thou­sands of pages and could keep you busy for a life time.


Once you under­stand the vast­ness of the law and the numer­ous oppor­tu­ni­ties to make a mis­take, it may be in your best inter­est to hire a pro­fes­sional if you have an impor­tant legal issue. You typ­i­cally only get one shot at a legal issue, so it doesn’t pay to take on a job you may not be fully equipped to han­dle on your own. How­ever, knowl­edge is power and know­ing how to research the law is a pow­er­ful tool to own. Who knows, maybe you’ll love research­ing the law and become a lawyer some day.

Jan
09

Can Orders on Motions to Dismiss Bankruptcy Cases Be Immediately Appealed?


When a Bank­ruptcy Court denies a motion to dis­miss a Chap­ter 7 bank­ruptcy case, is that court order a “final” order, giv­ing the U.S. Trustee the right to appeal the deci­sion imme­di­ately? A recently decided Fourth Cir­cuit Court of Appeals case says that such an order is final and an appeal can take place imme­di­ately, even if final res­o­lu­tion of the bank­ruptcy case remains pend­ing.

In McDow v. Dud­ley, the Fourth Cir­cuit reviewed a Vir­ginia bank­ruptcy court’s denial of the U.S. Trustee’s motion to dis­miss David and Anne Dudley’s chap­ter 7 bank­ruptcy case. The Dud­leys had filed for Chap­ter 13 bank­ruptcy in 2008, but con­verted their case to a chap­ter 7 case after the U.S. Trustee filed a motion to dis­miss or covert their case.

After the 341 meet­ing of the cred­i­tors, the U.S. Trustee moved to dis­miss the Dud­leys’ chap­ter 7 case because they failed the means test.

The Dud­leys argued and the Vir­ginia bank­ruptcy court agreed that the means test only applied to cases that were “filed” under chap­ter 7 of the bank­ruptcy code, not cases that were “con­verted” to chap­ter 7, such as theirs. The U.S. Trustee appealed the deci­sion, but the Bank­ruptcy Court claimed that its order deny­ing dis­missal could not be appealed, because it was not a final order (as the bank­ruptcy case was still active).

Nev­er­the­less, the Fourth Cir­cuit Court of Appeals decided on Novem­ber 30, 2011 that such an order is a final and appeal­able order, due to the ephemeral nature of bank­ruptcy pro­ceed­ings. The Fourth Cir­cuit basi­cally rea­soned that, because not allow­ing an appeal would ulti­mately lead to a bank­ruptcy dis­charge and would per­mit the Dud­leys to then liq­ui­date assets to which cred­i­tors might have a legal claim, the order was final and appeal­able. In short, the court stated that it would be impos­si­ble to undo the effects of the bank­ruptcy if an appeal had to wait until the end of the entire bank­ruptcy case to be appealed.

Dec
31

In Bankruptcy, You Won’t Lose Your Shirt, But You Could Lose Your Name

portland_bankruptcy_blog_photo_of_name_tag_hello_my_name_is_blank
The bank­ruptcy laws are designed to insure that you come out on the other end able to suc­ceed finan­cially. That is why the law per­mits you to keep cer­tain “exempt” prop­erty when fil­ing bank­ruptcy. Many peo­ple get to keep their house, car, fur­ni­ture, clothes, jew­elry, sport­ing equip­ment, IRAs and 401Ks, and much more in bank­ruptcy and still get rid of their debt.

The sys­tem is designed so you don’t lose your shirt essen­tially. The thought behind this being, if we let peo­ple get out from under their debts, we don’t want them fil­ing again in a few short years. This makes sense because it is hard to get back out there and stay ahead if you have no wheels to get to work and so on.

How­ever, a recent Ten­nessee bank­ruptcy case will likely take a man’s name. Nashville rap­per Young Buck recently filed bank­ruptcy and will likely be los­ing the trade­mark to his hip-hop moniker. Trade­marks are not typ­i­cally exempt from bank­ruptcy, so the bank­ruptcy trustee may try its hand at sell­ing the rights to (the artist for­merly known as) Young Buck’s name in order to help pay back some of his cred­i­tors.

What does this mean for the aver­age cit­i­zen? Noth­ing really, unless you make a liv­ing off of your trade­marked name­sake. How­ever, it does beg the oft asked ques­tion, “what is really in a name?“

Dec
28

U.S. District Court of Oregon says Blogger Crystal Cox Not a Journalist

On Novem­ber 30, 2011, the United States Dis­trict Court issued an opin­ion in the trial against blog­ger Crys­tal Cox find­ing that she is not a jour­nal­ist and there­fore not enti­tled to pro­tec­tion under the media shield laws of Ore­gon.

The con­tro­versy stemmed from a blog post in which Ms. Cox called Kevin Padrick, partial-owner of Obsid­ian Finance LLC, sev­eral allegedly deroga­tory names. Obsid­ian Finance LLC then filed a law­suit in United States Dis­trict Court against Ms. Cox for defama­tion.

Ms. Cox, rep­re­sent­ing her­self, claimed that the state­ments were fac­tual in nature and there­fore not defam­a­tory (an ele­ment of defama­tion is that the state­ment be false). How­ever, Ms. Cox refused to divulge her source to the court, claim­ing her source was pro­tected under the media shield laws of Ore­gon under ORS 44.510–44.540.

ORS 44.520 pro­tects “person[s] con­nected with, employed by or engaged in any medium of com­mu­ni­ca­tion to the pub­lic” by pro­hibit­ing lawyers and judges from sub­poe­naing (and oth­er­wise forc­ing that indi­vid­ual to dis­close) the “source of any pub­lished or unpub­lished infor­ma­tion obtained by the per­son in the course of gath­er­ing, receiv­ing or pro­cess­ing infor­ma­tion for any medium of com­mu­ni­ca­tion to the pub­lic.“

“Medium of Com­mu­ni­ca­tion” is fur­ther described in the statute as includ­ing, but not lim­ited to, “any news­pa­per, mag­a­zine or other peri­od­i­cal, book, pam­phlet, news ser­vice, wire ser­vice, news or fea­ture syn­di­cate, broad­cast sta­tion or net­work, or cable tele­vi­sion sys­tem.” ORS 44.510(2).

Amongst other rul­ings, the court deter­mined that Ms. Cox was not afforded the pro­tec­tions of ORS 44.520, because she was not affil­i­ated with any of the listed medi­ums of com­mu­ni­ca­tion under ORS 44.510(2). This deci­sion has been crit­i­cized widely over the past few weeks and is at odds with other juris­dic­tions around the coun­try, includ­ing Wash­ing­ton State. As a result, Ms. Cox was found liable for defama­tion and ordered to pay Obsid­ian Finance LLC dam­ages north of two mil­lion dollars.

Nov
26

Svidenko v. DMV (A146173) Case Summary

When chal­leng­ing a sus­pen­sion of your dri­ving priv­i­leges related to a fail­ure of blood alco­hol test­ing or refusal thereof, you have ten days from arrest to chal­lenge your dri­vers license sus­pen­sion.  The gen­eral rule is that after those ten days, you may no longer chal­lenge the sus­pen­sion in an admin­is­tra­tive hear­ing before the DMV.

How­ever, a rarely ref­er­enced pro­vi­sion of the law per­mits a per­son fac­ing a license sus­pen­sion to file for a hear­ing after the ten days have passed if his or her fail­ure to request a timely hear­ing was a result of “just cause.”  ORS 813.440(1)(g). Read the rest of this entry »

Nov
14

Can Filing For Bankruptcy Actually Help Your Credit Score?

Every­one knows that fil­ing bank­ruptcy is a last resort because it will wreck your credit score. Or do they? Recent reports from Credit.com Edu­ca­tional Ser­vices, a con­sumer credit edu­ca­tion group, show that in cer­tain cases fil­ing bank­ruptcy actu­ally caused debtors credit scores to rise. Why is this? In short, there are a few rea­sons, and they do not and will not apply to all filers.

Read the rest of this entry »